Embracing Life shouldn't scare anyone.
People living in darkness do not see that life is created at conception, so they rationalize that it is not a life until it is crawling on the ground, and therefore have a man-made "right" to destroy God's work until then, using various excuses. The latest being that stem cells will magically fix all kinds of diseases, without any evidence to date, just a theory, much like the "theories" of evolution and global warming.
Perhaps this is why the EU which has mostly rejected religious values and morality is now accepting of this stem cell research.
If something is said and heard enough, no matter if true of not, ignorant people will eventually accept anything as being correct. This is where the liberal media comes in. They ignore real evidence while pushing irrational ideas based on wild emotions rather than the logic of factual truth. They want to bend reality to conform to their pre-judged interpretations of how it 'ought' to be according to whatever feelings and concensus they are led to believe at any given time.
Spying and Treason
Many democrats realize the liberal left has cost them too much by being so radical and so far out of the mainstream, leading most Americans to disqualify the party outright, as the facts expose the real liberal agenda that goes against not only the U.S. Constitution, but family values, freedom of speech and religion.
The real crime having been committed is not what the president did, but the leak of sensitive-secret NSA program to the liberal media by someone for political partisanship, which could be grounds for legal action of treason, by having given a dangerous enemy knowledge to use against America while in a time of war.
The US Justice Department has opened a probe into the leaking of classified information which revealed that President George W. Bush had authorized a secret government wiretap program, an official source said.
The president's call for a probe came after US media (NYT) reported that Bush had authorized the NSA to engage in an operation to monitor massive volumes of telephone and Internet communications.
The president's order enabled the NSA to monitor, without a warrant, international telephone calls and electronic mail of US citizens suspected of ties to Al-Qaeda.
While the U.S. government, supported by majorities in national polls, is ignoring laws on oversight of homeland spying, the British are developing systems to literally follow, photographically, every citizen on his or her daily rounds.
Big Brother, the fictional invention of a British writer, George Orwell, will be real and functional within a year. The first step, scheduled to be operational next March, will use thousands of cameras linked to government databases to photograph every vehicle entering or leaving London, driving on major highways or stopping for gasoline -- and checking those movements against driver's licenses and other government information over two- and five-year periods.
"The new national surveillance network for tracking car journeys," said Steve Conner, science editor of The Independent, "... is already working on ways of automatically recognizing human faces by computer ... every move recorded and stored by machines."
Police also project a need for more complicated surveillance systems, schemes aided by hidden computer chips in new cars and trucks.
The system, originally planned as a crime-prevention and detection system, has been in development for 25 years. In Britain, as well as in the United States, police quickly realized that such innovations as automatic cash machines and EZ-pass readers provided a rough map of many people's lives -- and led to thousands upon thousands of criminal arrests. But there is no doubt that terrorism incidents and threats will speed development and make what were once considered unacceptable invasions of privacy more acceptable to the British -- and, one day, to Americans as well.
Seems Big Brother is growing two heads!
Dems should take lesson from Lieberman
Concerning the war in Iraq, most democrat's are proving to the nation how hypocritically wrong and unAmerican they are in their desire to retreat from Iraq, especially with elections happening this week that will give the new Iraqi government a solid foundation on the road to full democracy in the middle east.
Democrats always want to put people into certain groups they can label.
Already we're hearing in the liberal media how unsuccessful the voting will be because the Sunni's are not fully taking part, yet. Even when a new ABC poll shows that 71% of Iraqis say their lives are better now than ever, despite divisions between "groups."
During the 2000 presidential race, Senator Lieberman was viewed as a sell-out for saying things Al Gore wanted him to, but that went against the values he had shown previously through many years of service.
Erroneously sensing political vulnerability in Bush’s handling of Iraq, Democrats are anxious to craft another anti-war theme to unite the disorganized party for the pivotal midterm congressional elections, even though they failed badly in their last try during the 2004 elections.
Democrats dream for a resurgent anti-war tide in 2006 to halt the GOP’s 12-year lock on the House and win back the Senate for the first time since 2001. Unfortunately for the hateful liberals, the war will be mostly over by next november as the Iraqi government takes more control against terrorists'. But then there's Iran to deal with.
Now it seems that Mr. Lieberman has corrected himself by sticking to his convictions in supporting the war effort, to the dismay of many democrats who've gone against him and their own votes for the war with ridiculous claims from the far left that the president and vice president lied, even well after claiming Saddam had WMD's going back to 1998. Where so many democrats have blinded themselves, Mr. Lieberman sees plainly what we along with our allies are fighting for in the War On Terror, against radical Muslims who want to force Islam onto the world.
According to this Washington Times editorial,Iranian intentions, Iran's president Mr. Mahmoud Ahmedinijad's agenda, which is strongly supported by Iran's clerics, precludes the possibility that Iran will stop developing its nuclear weapons and therefore that there can be a peaceful resolution for this problem.
Iran claims that it deserves to be a nuclear power like the United States and Russia. However, unlike the United States and Russia, which developed nuclear arsenals as mechanisms of deterrence, Iran by all indications is developing a nuclear arsenal as a mechanism to set off a chain reaction of death resulting in the destruction of a third of the world's population in order to facilitate the arrival of the Mahdi.
Not surprisingly, Iran has just passed a new law to ban foreign inspections of its nuclear facilities, and at the same time announced its plan to build 20 more nuclear plants.
Leftists' like Howard Dean, suddenly claim they didn't say what they did. Fortunately, the facts are recorded that expose their denials of reality, thus making them look deceptive and weak at the same time. Our troops and the public deserve better than this current crop of liberal liars and moderates playing politics during wartime.
This insane hypocrisy is not just playing politics, it is a vicious attempt to overthrow the American government during a time of war, by a party that has let itself be hijacked by shills so far left, they make the old soviet's look conservative.
By now, everyone realizes these cowardly naysayers with defeatist attitudes are Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Howard Dean, John Edwards, Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, the leaders of the democratic party, trying to make Hillary Clinton look like a centrist, care only about their power and money over the little guy while claiming the exact opposite to the public through their media cohorts.
These Dems who claim to speak for the entire party, want the United States of America to bail out like we did in Vietnam, and show the world that we are just a paper tiger who retreats in times of trouble. Then if they can get the Bush administration to do that, they'll turn the tables and go the other way, thus exposing their ultimate hypocrisy. For them it is all about their politics, not about doing the right thing for America or anyone else in the world. For even more proof of how lost the dems are, read this right-on article by David Limbaugh:... Democrats: Boxed in politically .
After the sacrifices of Vietnam, America lost due to the weak-kneed policy of the left demanding a pull out from the war, on the cusp of victory. That is exactly what they're trying do again, but failing miserably as most American's remember the disaster liberals made of our position in the world with their selfish pettiness then.
Immature liberals should keep quiet and let the grown-ups save our world without hearing their incessant whining. Perhaps it would be a good idea to move the voting age up to at least age 21, so these boisterous youngen's have a chance to be deprogrammed by reality from the Michael Moore, Al Freakin and MoveON.org's marxist brainwashing machine.
Onward or Reverse?
President Bush's policies he outlined Thursday night from a conservative president, a hallmark of an executive who has never shrunk from seeking to implement a right-leaning agenda even in the face of a divided country. He is after all a Republican, so doing the Right thing is always good.
The divide is not just racial or left vs right, it is about good vs evil in these difficult times.
Bush wants grants and loans for business's, including tax relief. He wants to fund the Hurricane recovery by cutting pork from the budget, not raising taxes or "rolling back" tax cuts. American's have always given in times like these voluntarily, so to add a tax hike on top of the disaster would certainly be the wrong thing to do.
The president also wants the private sector to initiate ideas to start the ball rolling, whereas democrats want to re-implement a nanny state from their past "great society" heyday, in order to keep those mostly poor victims dependent on government welfare, and hence keep elected democrat's seated in power of the state.
The last thing anyone on the left actually wants is for poor people to be given opportunities to make their lives better for themselves.
However, most on the right are truly compassionate people who do care about the poor, and truly desire to help them help themselves.
Think about it. Most of the truly rich are liberal democrats who've claimed for decades how much they want to help the poor. Yet in the poor states when democrats are in control of that state's government, (Louisiana for example) the poor only get poorer because they were bamboozled by fast talking emotionally condescending democrats who promise the world and deliver nothing but more taxes and less jobs, in order to keep them poor.
For without poor people needing government, democrats and their welfare mantra quickly become irrelevant, and that's why they want to keep the poor, poor.
Democrats claim the opposite of the truth–that they want to help the poor,– but they only want their votes, promising them the world with rhetoric like, "We can do more," "We need more resources" (ie tax money) "We must do more," "Tax cuts are for the rich" (the poor don't pay taxes!) and on and on.
The social programs of liberals instituted by democrat politician's don't work in this day and age to get anyone ahead or out of poverty. Mainly because they're ALL corrupt, taking the money they claim is earmarked for the poor, for themselves! Then they claim constantly they need more taxes to keep their silly programs going. It's a huge scam played on the poor by the rich democrats, not Republican's as falsely whined by liberal democrats and their DNC scripted talking-head cohorts in the media.
Then when the next election comes around, the democrats start their promise machine back up and start the whole thing again. This is how democrats remain viable, by lying about or simply covering up what their actual agenda really is, which is to create a socialist government where all citizens become dependent on a shared welfare state that tells everyone what to do, who to see, what they can have, and how much to pay, with democrats in charge.
All one has to do is look at Teddy Kennedy, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Dick Durbin, and the Hollywood elite to see how arrogant and stuck up these liberals truly are. Anyone who "feels" these rich democrats have your best interest in mind are fooling themselves, because these rich polititicans are only out for themselves and their like minded groups.
People are waking up to these facts today because of the freedom of information anyone can get through other sources outside of the main stream media, who have had carte blanche on deciding what information gets out to the people for the last 60 years.
There is a revolution coming in this nation and the liberal democrats are scared to death as they're being found out for the liars they are and have been all these many years.
The liberal media is losing their base, democrat liars are being exposed, Republicans are seen as honest and for the people who want freedom against government control.
Google's Grandiose Gamble
Could the worlds biggest search engine be about to crumble like the dot coms of the 1990's?
Google, the biggest player in the global Internet advertising market, gets the vast majority of its revenue from Web search advertising.
There is a current class action lawsuit against Google, charging that the company over charged its advertising customers. Google of course denies it. It's grandiose image is starting to tarnish as people begin to realize the stakes of gambling on a search engine.
Shares of Google closed down $1.10 to $291.25 on Nasdaq. The stock is 7.2 percent below its record close of $313.94 on July 21.
The political party who constantly criticizes the other of being the one who caters to the "rich" has been exposed for the valueless liars they are.
Democrats have blamed Republicans for decades as being the party of big corporations who give tax cuts to their wealthy friends. But the reality it is that the democrat supporters who are the richest men in the world, giving big dinner fund raisers and millions for advertising purposes against republicans in order to get power over the people to then steal their money in higher taxes for wasteful or non-existent "government" welfare programs. Democrats are simply massive liars who cannot be trusted by the public, especially in this age of terrorism.
Google is one of those companies, who just happens to have billions of dollars to give. In fact, the CEO of Google, Eric Schmidt who's shares are worth in excess of $1.5 BILLION, held a $10,000.00/plate dinner for the failed vice president Al Gore in 2000. Why didn't he just fork over the money himself? Because he's a greasy-selfish-bastard like all democrats!
If you'll remember, Al Gore was playing the class warfare card then! Democrats always say the opposite of the truth, and the liberal media lets them do it in order to keep the truly rich ones happy while falsely claiming they're the party who cares about the little guy.
What a crock!
Can you believe how they lie? George Soros is a mega-billionaire who got rich off of others by cutting down the stock prices of companies with insider trading gimmicks. He's also a major supporter of democrats, giving the Kerry campaign well over $200 million of his stolen money.
So anytime you hear the democrats playing the class warfare card, know that it is they who are the party of the ULTRA-RICH, who don't pay taxes because their money is in Switzerland banks.
That's why they want YOU to pay for everything by imposed taxes!
Dems to ruin Judge Roberts?
Already it seems democrats have dug in their heels and started-in against Bush's new nominee, appellate court Judge John Roberts for the Supreme Court. Democrats want a litmus test for any conservative judge, but feel it isn't necessary for a liberal judge to be questioned at all. The hypocrisy stinks so bad, sewers smell sweet.
In a well thought out decision for Sandra Day O'Connor's replacement, president Bush has nominated appeals court Judge John Roberts to fill the U.S. Supreme Court vacancy. The only question remaining for his approval is, "How low are the democrats willing to go in trying to smear Mr. Roberts to make their liberal base of baby killers happy?"
What they should be asking themselves after the nation got a chance to see and hear him is, "How many voters are they willing to risk losing if they do?"
Mr. Roberts is already being attacked for co-writting a Supreme Court brief for the first Bush administration arguing the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that overturned state laws banning abortion, was wrongly decided. But that was for a client while working as a lawyer, not making a decision working as a judge.
We don't know too much about Mr. Roberts, but what we do know is that he is a fine man by all accounts, even democrats give him that. And since his approval to the appellate court, dems will have a hard time in stopping his ascension.
The attacks by democrats are up and running. NewsMax.com reports that the Bean town rag Boston Globe has just come out with a hit piece on Robert's wife, claming she is a pro-life woman. OUCH! She wants to save babies lives? OH, NOOOOOO, say the baby killing liberals.
Mrs. Roberts served as an executive veep for "Feminists for Life" whos mission statement according to Carl Limbacher says, "Feminists for Life recognizes that abortion is a reflection that our society has failed women. We are dedicated to systematically eliminating the root causes that drive women to abortion - primarily lack of practical resources and support - through holistic woman-centered solutions.
"Women deserve better than abortion," the mission statement continues.
"Feminists for Life continues the tradition of early American feminists such as Susan B. Anthony, who opposed abortion."
So liberals now have a target, only she wasn't nominated by the president.
In clearing 5 FBI background checks, democrats will have a hard time finding anything of substance to smear him with. All Judge Roberts has to do is answer questions in the simplest of terms because the democrat senators are not nearly as smart as he is. The issues that Ultra liberal senator Teddy Kennedy said were important on Wednesday's Today Show was a dodge from the real issue of abortion that he can't wait to attack with.
"what these hearings are about are really the question and the challenge to make sure that we’re going have someone who stands on the side of working families, the middle class, of ordinary people, when you get right down to it.
The American people during this process want to know is he [Roberts] going to be on the side of the major corporate interests or is he going to be on the (side of the) consumers’ interest? Will he be on the side of the polluters or will he be on the side of those that believe that the Congress had the right to pass important legislation on the environment? And will he be on the side of workers, or is he going to be on the side of the bosses? Those are the issues..."
Senator Chuckles Schumer of New York said that Roberts has refused to answer "important questions." Gee Chuck, like what? How about asking this question: "What is your position on driving a pair of pliers into innocent babies head and pulling out it's brains just as the living baby is being born in order to murder it as requested by the mother in a partial birth abortion procedure?" Too harsh? It's reality and it's pure evil!
You know Teddy, you're really getting up there in age and your time is getting very close now. Will you be making your final mistake, or will you try to repent of your past sins? And don't forget about Mary Jo, who you left to die in your car on a bridge after you crashed in a drunken stupor. So which way will you go this time Mr. Lifer on the taxpayers dole?
Dissent from the left, and the right writers
From the
"Informed Comment" comes this liberal load of b.s.,
"George W. Bush's nomination of John Roberts, Jr. is a setback for American women, just has his policies in Iraq have produced a setback for women's rights in the Arab world. Indeed, Bush has been bad for women all around the globe." That's the liberal brain at work folks. Bush has freed the Iraqi woman from their taskmasters and this liberal writer Mr. Juan Cole has the gall to say that Bush has set them back? The women in Iraq have just voted for the first time EVER! So does Mr. Cole feels that woman should not be allowed to vote? Talk about a partisan fool, this guy takes the cake.
But Roberts may have some problems coming from the right as well. Conservative columnist Ann Coulter chimed in with a stinging rebuke of Bush's pick, saying that he might be another Souter, picked by president Bush the first, that turned out to be a disaster for the court. She added: "We don't know much about John Roberts," Coulter writes in a
column today. "Stealth nominees have never turned out to be a pleasant surprise for conservatives. Never. Not ever."
Most people who know Judge Roberts have only good things to say about him. He seems like a decent man who cares about family and faith. Let us all hope and pray he is the man his appearance has shown him to be while arguing for clients in front of the court, after being confirmed to give judgments sitting behind the court.
Obama: "Dems have no values"
A rally at Macedonia Missionary Baptist Church on Sunday, the first question to U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, D-IL, was this: "I see a Democratic Party afraid to say they're Democrats, who voted for the war in Iraq and voted for tax cuts for the wealthy," said Glenn Anderson of Orlando. "Why should I remain a Democrat?"
The answer given by Obama was more revealing than intended. "The Democrats at times have lost their way," conceded Obama. "We are trying to decide what our core values are."
With that lame answer, Mr. Anderson, has likely switched to being a Republican now, like millions of others who've realized democrats have absolutely nothing of value to offer America.
Weighing in on the rising costs of health-care, Obama gave his small audience this empty rhetoric -- "We're all getting hurt" -- and the out-sourcing of American jobs. The biggest challenge in the United States, he said, is how to make sure workers can support families in a global economy.
"We're seeing manufacturing jobs leave [America]," Obama said. "We're losing those jobs and ending up at fast-food restaurants with no benefits. Oh, yes, and gas prices are going up." Reportedly, the audience responded with "hefty" applause to the senator's whining.
But one has to take note that nowhere in Obama's words were any solutions whatsoever. None. His so-called "star power" is vein and worthless in the long run because it has no basis in reality. Describing the problem doesn't fix them. Whining about things won't get the job done, and that is all the democrats have to offer other than feel good rhetoric, because they have no ideas on how to do anything other than raise taxes on the rich, which has now been proven to be a failed idea having the opposite effect of the stated result democrats have promised time and again.
Here's what Hillary had to say on Mondy, "There has not yet been one net job created in the last four years" - a claim contradicted by economic statistics.
The fact is that job numbers have increased steadily during president Bush's leadership since his predecessor left the nation in a recession after his false bubble-economy popped and millions lost their jobs because of Clinton's huge tax hikes that strangled American corporations and small business productivity. Last Friday's unemployment was down to 5%, the lowest in four years which outs Hillary as the biggest liar in the world. She just can't face reality!
Of course democrats have no answers because they don't even know what they or America stand for. Oh sure, they say they stand up for the "little guy," but in reality they don't. What democrats do is cater to their wealthy hollywood friends and corporate CEO's with party's and media events offering a lot of glitz and sizzle, but no steak. How much good does any of that do for the people? None!
To a litany of social ills, Nelson responded more than once, "I have and will continue to fight for the least of those among us." What a crock!
Sorry Nelson, but the people want answers, not a continual head butt against the wall that offers no solutions. Democrats have certainly lost their way and their values are non-existent because they've been exposed for who they are, which are corrupt appeasers who care only about themselves and want to take the people's money away and waste it on inept government programs that don't do squat for anyone, but keep people locked into a bad way of life while promising them better days ahead with more empty words.
Senator Obama is all show and no go, as are most democrats at their liberal core.
But he looks and sounds good, doesn't he?
Sources: http://drudgereport.com/
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/orl-locobama10071005jul10,0,2374313,print.story
